MMP was originally used to elect representatives to the German Bundestag. It has been adopted by Bolivia, Lesotho and New Zealand. It was also used in Romania during its 2008 and 2012 legislative elections. In Germany, where it is used on the federal level and in most states, MMP is known as personalized proportional representation.
About Mixed-member proportional representation in brief

In German states, most states do not use MMP until after the federal election, but federally, not until the German federal election in 2016. In New Zealand, 27.33% of voters split their vote compared to 31.64% in 2014. Overhang seats may reduce the proportionality of the system, although this can be compensated for by allocating additional party list seats to cover any proportionality gap. If a party wins more seats than the proportional quota received by FPTP, these surplus seats become overhang seats to work towards restoring a full proportionality. This can be done by either the D’Hondt method or the Sainte-Laguë method or Subtracted from each party’s party’s vote. At the regional or national level, several different calculation methods have been used, but the basic characteristic of the M MP is that the total number of seats in the assembly, and not only the party-list seats, are allocated proportionally to the number of votes the party received in the party portion of the ballot. In the original variant used in Germany, citizens gave only one vote, so that voting for a representative automatically meant also voting for the representative’s party. Most of Germany changed to the two-vote variant to make local members of parliament more personally accountable.
You want to know more about Mixed-member proportional representation?
This page is based on the article Mixed-member proportional representation published in Wikipedia (as of Nov. 29, 2020) and was automatically summarized using artificial intelligence.






