King brown snake

King brown snake

The king brown snake is native to northern, western, and Central Australia. It is variable in appearance, with individuals from northern Australia having tan upper-parts, while those from southern Australia are dark brown to blackish. The venom is not as potent as those of Australia’s other dangerous snakes but can still cause severe effects if delivered in large enough quantities.

About King brown snake in brief

Summary King brown snakeThe king brown snake is native to northern, western, and Central Australia. It is variable in appearance, with individuals from northern Australia having tan upper-parts, while those from southern Australia are dark brown to blackish. The venom is not as potent as those of Australia’s other dangerous snakes but can still cause severe effects if delivered in large enough quantities. Deaths from its bites have been recorded, with the most recent being in 1969. Its victims are treated with black-snake antivenom. The snake is considered to be a least-concern species according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, though may have declined with the spread of the cane toad. The species was first described by the English zoologist John Edward Gray in 1842 from a specimen collected at Port Essington in the Northern Territory. In 1955, Australian herpetologist Roy Mackay concluded that several species previously described were synonymous with P. australis, recognising that it was a highly variable taxon. Two new species and a new genus have been described within this complex by Australian snake-handler Raymond Hoser. These include the eastern dwarf mulga snake and the pygmy mulga. snake, found in the Papuan Papuan Jay Jay region of Australia. These descriptions were initially received with skepticism due to the low level of evidence provided in the original descriptions. They were later resurrected by Hoser, and later Hoser also resurrected the Pygmy Mulga snake in the Australian Outback.

The two new species were found to be monotypic and highly variable until German biologist Ulrich Kuchrich and colleagues analysed the mitochondrial DNA of the dwarf form from the Kimberley and northwestern Queensland in 2005. They recovered four distinct clages ; the other three diverged between six and four million years ago with the rest from the rest of the family. The clade clade was a clade of large snakes found across Australia, clade I was clade III and clade IV contained two dwarf forms from the northwestern Kimberley, and two dwarf form forms from northwestern Queensland. In 2005, Hoser found that the clade II was a dwarf form of cladeClade I contained two dwarfed forms and two dwarf forms from northwest Queensland and two northwestern clade Clade IV from Kimberley. This clade I diverged from the other cladeclade clades in the Pleistocene Clade II and III. The last clade to diverge from the others was the Clade III clade from the Clistade IV clade, which was found in north-west Queensland and northwestern New South Wales in the 1990s. The new clade is the clistade I clade VII, which contains the dwarf forms clade V, VI, VII, and VII from the north-eastern and northwestern parts of the state of Queensland, and the dwarf clade VIII from the south-easterly parts of NSW and South-West Territories.