Official investigations in both Britain and France found that Diana died in a manner consistent with media reports following the fatal car crash in Paris on 31 August 1997. Theorists have alleged that the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, acting head of Ritz security Henri Paul, was in the pay of a national security service. The families of Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul did not accept the findings of the French investigation.
About Death of Diana, Princess of Wales, conspiracy theories in brief
After 1998, it was theorised that there was an orchestrated criminal conspiracy surrounding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. Official investigations in both Britain and France found that Diana died in a manner consistent with media reports following the fatal car crash in Paris on 31 August 1997. Theorists have alleged that the driver of the Mercedes-Benz, acting head of Ritz security Henri Paul, was in the pay of a national security service. Another allegation concerns the reliability of blood tests carried out, which indicated Paul had been drinking before he took the controls of the car. The families of Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul did not accept the findings of the French investigation. A special Metropolitan Police inquiry team was established in 2004, Operation Paget, to investigate the various conspiracy theories which led up to the British inquest. This investigation looked into 175 conspiracy claims that had been made by Fayed. In 2003, Diana’s butler Paul Burrell published a note that he claimed had been written by Diana, in which there were allegations that her former husband was planning an accident. Mohamed Al-Fayed claims that Henri Paul was working for MI6 and that they set him up. In November 2006, Lord Stevens had met with Paul’s elderly parents telling them that their son was not drunk. Just prior to Stevens’s appearance at the inquest, a source close to Stevens stated that this inconsistency could be explained as him being ‘considerate’ and ‘sensitive’ towards the elderly couple, an assessment Scott Baker suggested might be credible in his opening comments to the jury. In February 2008, Stevens denied that Paul’s condition at the time of the crash did match the definition of being drunk.
He said that the level of alcohol reported to have been found in Paul’s blood was inconsistent with his sober demeanour, as captured on the CCTV of the Ritz that evening. In the two French TOAB tests, Paul was found to have consumed only two alcoholic drinks, but this was not necessarily all that suggested that he was indeed under the influence of alcohol. An expert cited the report estimated that Paul had drunk the equivalent of five Ricice-flavoured Ricice bottles, his favourite liquor. A combination of blood-carrying pigments and carbon monoxide has normally about a 10% carbon dioxide saturation, a combination of iron- carrying pigment and a monoxide monoxide saturation, normally about 10%. Aperitifs are normally about five times the French legal limit, before driving, before a driving accident. The French authorities carried out a third test, this time using the more medically conclusive vitreous fluid from inside the eye, which confirmed thelevel of alcohol measured by blood and also showed Paul had also been taking antidepressants. The inquiry found no evidence that Paul was an agent for any security service, though different versions of the allegation name the country of the security service alternately as Britain, France or the United States. In 2008, a jury in 2008 returned a verdict of ‘unlawful killing’ by driver Henri Paul and the paparazzi. The jury’s verdict also stated: ‘The death of the deceased were not wearing a seat belt and by the fact that the Mercedes struck the pillar in the Alma Tunnel rather than colliding with something else’
You want to know more about Death of Diana, Princess of Wales, conspiracy theories?
This page is based on the article Death of Diana, Princess of Wales, conspiracy theories published in Wikipedia (as of Dec. 08, 2020) and was automatically summarized using artificial intelligence.
